Interview with Hugh Blumenfeld
4/9/00
Paul called
Hugh and interviewed him from his home in Connecticut. Paul has met Hugh
twice in the past, both times at Falcon Ridge. Last year he stayed at
Camp Hon til the sun rose on Sunday morning sharing songs, jokes and observations
with us.
Paul: You have a doctorate in poetics. Excuse my ignorance, but
is that different than a doctorate in poety?
Hugh: Its a special program at NYU. I dont think anyone
gets a doctorate in poetry anyway. This program is supposed to be a new
approach to studying poetry: figuring out what it is about poetry that
moves us, and how to communicate this aspect of poetry to larger audiences.
Trying to make poetry once again a viable art form in the culture.
Paul: I often get this question from people: what is the difference
between a poem and a song lyric?
Hugh: A song lyric you sing.
Paul: And thats the only difference?
Hugh: Yeah, at 11;30 this morning, thats my final answer.
<Paul laughs>
Hugh: No, a lot of poetry you cant sing. But poetry originally
was always sung. You know Boewolf was sung and the Torah is still sung
every week. They dont read the Bible they sing it.
Paul: So, even today you can take a poem and turn it into a song.
Hugh: Thats what I do. Thats a lot of what my workshops
are about.
I do it not only with poems but also with journals, stories, letters.
The neatest workshop that I did lately is where we did letter writing
for the first half. And I give certain writing cues that elicit pretty
cool letters. And then in the second half we sing them.
Paul: Interesting.
Hugh: What is interesting is that music just structures language
in a set way. So even if you didnt write in in meter or as a poem,
you can frame it in music.
Paul: That reminds me, theres always a discussion of what
comes first- lyrics or melody. How does it work for you?
Hugh: I think for most of the songwriters I know, its different
for every song. When Im lucky the music and words come together
for a stretch.
Paul: They arrive at the same time.
Hugh: Yeah, but not a whole song necessarily, but a stretch, a
phrase. And then it becomes a sort of crystal. And if youve been
mulling enough stuff in your mind for a time, then that one musical phrase
crystalizes everything else around it. One musical phrase will suggest
another one in terms of melody. And then two musical phrases suggest two
more. And one metaphor suggests another one, one image will suggest another.
And you build from there.
Paul: Do you have any daily writing exercises or habits?
Do you try to wirter everyday or just when the muse hits you?
Hugh: I write something everyday but not always creative writing.
Most of my freelance work is writing. I write articles, reviews, letters.
But I wish I were more disciplined.
The best writing for me is in the car.
Paul: Really? I guess you have a tape recorder with you?
Hugh: No, not usually. With my process, if you cant remember
it, then it wasnt worth it in the first place. Or when youre
in the car you keep repeating the song to remember it. And its sort
of like writing a draft, since every time you go through it you change
a syllable or a word.
Paul: And you do it all in your head, you don't even scribble a
note?
Hugh: Yeah.
Paul: I guess that time in the car is sort of a forced alone time,
because in America most people are driving alone.
Hugh: Yeah.
Paul: And when youre alone you get time to think.
Hugh: But you have to resist the temptation to turn on the radio.
Paul: Right, thats my problem. Im always turning on
the radio or a tape. I surround myself with music from the moment I wake
up in the morning.
Hugh: Well, we all do. Its so hard to get any quiet time
anywhere. So the car can be a nice little isolation tank.
<Paul laughs>
Hugh: And theres something about moving that even infants
know is soothing.
Paul: Thats true, infants will fall asleep in a car. And
I think a lot of great tunes are ones that sound good when youre
riding around in a car. Theres groove to the road.
Hugh: I wrote "Brothers" in the car, I wrote "Shoot
the Moon" in the car. I wrote the "Long Haired Radical Jew"
in the car.
Paul: What has been the reaction to "Long Haired Radical Jew"?
I know you sang that song at the Falcon Ridge showcase last year and it
elicited a great response from people. Do you always get that kind of
response to that song?
Hugh: I usually do. Its a cheating song. Its not the
best thing I ever wrote but it gets a great response. Its just a
hard song to ignore. The only problem I ever had with it was at the Greater
Chicago Jewish Folk Arts Festival. They asked me not to play it. I thought
that was one place that it would be great to play it. I was really looking
forward to it.
And you know in Jerusalem, you cant say the "J" word on
the radio. That was unexpected. But it made sense. I played that song
all over Israel and never had a problem. I find with political songs fewer
people get offended than you think will get offended. Its rare that
people actually have a problem.
Paul: On some of your songs I sensed a religious background. Could
you comment on where youre coming from?
Hugh: Well I think every poet has a religious background. Ive
got to remember Im being taped here.<Hugh hesitates to get the
right wording> I grew up in a reform temple, that tradition.
Paul: Is religion something you dont want to talk about?
Hugh: No, its just hard to formulate exactly what Im trying
to say. I guess mostly Ive been working antogonistically toward
my religious background. I mean theres always the gadfly. And I
grew up in the tradition, and had been taught a lot about it. And ever
since then you try to create your own story out of it.
Paul: You try to follow your own road, find your own path.
Hugh: Yeah.
Paul: I thnk we all do that.
Hugh: Most of my songs draw on the tradition in some way. I mean
I dont go to temple or belong to a congregation. I use songwrting
for that.
Paul: When you went to Israel recently, how was your music accepted?
Hugh: I had a great time. The first thing is that it was a self-selected
audience. The people who came out to the folk concerts, they call them
Anglo-Saxons. Anybody in Israel who is from an English speaking country
are considered Anglo-Saxons. And its a different crowd than those
with Hebrew as their first language. Which I think at this point is the
majority of the country. The folk music crowd is a small group. But I
had a great time, they liked the songs a lot. I was surprised by the reaction
to "This Mountain".
Paul: I love that song. The first time I met you I was working
on learning to cover that song. Its a cool song that I really relate
to and its positive message and energy.
Hugh: Thanks. I was surprised in Israel that song didnt go
over so well.
Paul: Were your expectations too high?
Hugh: No, For someone who is not Israeli to be singing semi-political
songs about the condition they live in every day and face the reality
of every day, its just a little too awkward. Like, "who are
you to discuss our politics". When I played in Europe I usually played
the Germany-Austria-Switzerland tour. And because my last name is German
sounding the first paragraph of any article always had to say that I was
from the United States. Otherwise people wouldnt come to hear me.
They come becuase youre American. And because they want to hear
you sing about American stuff. So, they didnt come to hear me talk
about Israeli stuff. And I have a song called "All the Wood of Lebanon"
about the Americans who got killed in Lebanon in 1983. It talks about
a boy who goes off to war and comes home in a box. It was just too painful
for people to hear. Here it was a political statement. There everyone
has a son or daughter who is there or gone. But is was an interesting
experience.
Paul: But you seem to temper your deeper, more serious songs with
a lot of humorous songs. What prompts you to come up with these types
of songs? Were you the class clown?
Hugh: Exactly the opposite. My brother was the class clown. I was
the very studious teachers pet. These humorous songs are a recent
development. My natural inclination is to write songs like "Brothers".
Write about twenty of them in row is what I used to do. But when I started
performing I realized that I needed something else in the show. So I covered
other peoples stuff like "Cezanne" by the Five Chinese
Brothers. I found quirky, funny songs to cover becaus you need that variety
in a show. I guess after a while I learned how to do it and find a funny
place inside myself.
Paul: Your song "John Wayne was a Thespian" is still
echoing in my mind from last year.
High: From that night at Camp Hon?
Paul: Yeah,
Hugh: Its sort of like a nasty imp inside that finally got
out.
Paul: Youre scheduled to do a songwriting and singing workshop
for us next month on May 13. What would you tell folk to expect or look
forward to?
Hugh: Hopefully theyll get to try things they never tried
before. And that my approach is a little unusual.
Paul: Unusual?
Hugh: Well, Ive never been interested in teaching with formulas
on how to write a song. What they can expect is to concentrate on process,
on creative things they can do.
Paul: Were into process.
I love the title of your singing workshop: "Using the Vocie that
God Gave You", because very few of us have operatic, or clear-cut
voices. Otherwise wed all have million dollar record deals. Just
with a great voice you can be working with that and leave the songwriting
to someone else.
Hugh: But what struck me, ever since listening to Dylan and the
Alan Lomax recordings is that anyone, even with most horrible voice can
have a powerful effect. And Im always amazed by how many people
try to sing in a way that their voice wasnt designed for. And thats
the only thing that doesnt work. You can sing as terribly as Leonard
Cohen. He sings in way that matches the problems in his voice.
Paul: And gets across his point.
Hugh: Not only that but it fits the song in such a way that you cant
imagine hearing the song in any other way. You hear him do "Suazanne"
and then you hear Judy Collins do it again and you say "Wow, Id
rather hear Leonard Cohen do it". And take Johnny Cash also.
Paul: I think theres a certain honesty in the singers
voice, when you get it that way.
Hugh: For me the idea is to figure out what kind of voice you have
and what it does well and what you can use it for. And to play with it.
I think a lot of people dont play enough with their voice.
Paul: Find what natural talent or range you have and work with
it.
Hugh: Right. Sort of like judo, turning this into a science.
Paul: Well you know I just heard this piece on Billie Holiday and
they were talking about how she didnt really have a great vocal
range. She just used what she had, worked phrasing and played with her
voice.
Hugh: Its always fascinated me that with a strong personality
you can have a strong commitment to a song.
I love hearing people with bad voices sing a song in such an emotional
way that it touches you. After all there are many people with fantastic
voices that sing schlock. And thats the other problem, some people
with great voices get away with murder. Theres a danger in having
a great voice-people think youre great no matter what.
Paul: I saw on your bio that you were part of the folk scene in
Greenwich Village in the early 80s. How do you think things have
changed in the last 20 years? From the time you arrived to todays
singer-songwriters.
Hugh: So many things have changed. I dont think theres
much of a scene left in New York City.
Paul: Now theyre all anti-folk.
Hugh: Well anti-folk started in the early 80s. It was the
punk folk people that called themselves that.
For a while in the early 80s when all the singer-songwriters were
stuck in New York City and there was no place to play really. Everyone
stayed in the city and there was a real community. And then once people
started making their living doing it, there was a resurgance of folk music
and a circuit started to develop. And suddenly everyone was on the road,
and the community just kind of fell apart.
And it used to be a real project to make an album, And Fast Folk was a
unique thing. For most of us that was our only experience going into the
studio. And now it seems that anyone who has twelve songs can put out
a CD. And does. It used to be that no one had their own albums. I put
out one in 87 and Fast Folk started in 82. So for five years,
most of the recordings were done communally. And that was part of it too,
we needed each other more back then.
Paul: I guess the whole scene across the nation has changed too
because of what you said, its so easy to produce a CD, and theres
a huge glut.
Hugh: Also I think the motivation has changed. Back then we were
a bunch of people who pursued songwriting, there was no market, we were
more like a bunch of poets than anything else.
Paul: Writing songs for the sake of writing songs.
Hugh: Yeah, Jack Hardy was a big influence. Its hard to overstate
his influence on the folk scene there.
Once a folk circuit started to develop, a lot of musicians came and they
would tell you " I was playing the bar scene, but then theres
this circuit of listening rooms and I really wanted to play that and I
realized I had to write some songs" So they wrote some songs. Its
not a terrible thing but its a different motivation. It came from
a different place and it has changed what people listen to on the folk
circuit. Its not really about the song anymore, its about
personality.
There are some great songwriters who stand out like gems like Richard
Shindell. But it[the song] doesnt seem to be the focus of the scene
anymore.
Paul: You are the official state troubadour of Connecticut. What
responsibilites and duties go with that title?
Hugh: There are none.<laughing>
Paul: How did you get that title?
Hugh: The commission on the arts appointed me. Its an honorary
position. Theres nothing attached to it except unbelievable amounts
of glory.<laughing>
No, it has helped me get some work here in Connecticut.
Paul: And it looks good on your resume.
Hugh: Yeah. But it was nice to get recognized. And it has led to
more work in schools. People call me up who would have never called me
up before. And theres some festivals and events that have decided
to use the state troubadour. Getting to play the Kennedy Center was helped
by the fact that I am the state troubadour.
Paul: Ill have to find out if Maryland has a state troubadour.
As one of my closing quesitons I like to ask if there anything you wish
interviewers would ask you?
Hugh: Thats a good way to cover your butt.<laughing>
No, thats a good question.
Paul: Thanks, I made it up myself.
Hugh: No, Ill have to think about that one.
Im doing a lot of improv in my shows and thats what one of
the workshops is going to be on. Thats what Im most interested
in these days.
Paul: Do you mean writing a song on the spot or improvising/changing
a song?
Hugh: Im talking about creating a song on the spot.
Paul: Have you ever seen Moxy Fruvous?
High: Yeah.
Paul: Thats something Ive seen them do.
Hugh: Its always a lot of fun and puts everyone in the moment.
There are some tricks to doing it and I think its fertile ground.
Rap music comes out of that originally. So were blues. After a while you
get some things that crystallize. But you can tell that theyre built
for that. And it winds up being a lot more natural than anyone expects.
Like when you see gymnastics on tv and they do that layout "L"
and everyone cheers and its one of the easiest positions. Improv
is very impressive, but its also very natural too.
Paul: Heres my standard closing question: Do you have any
advice to our songwriters?
Hugh: Come to the workshop.
<Paul laughs>
Hugh Blumenfeld writes
a regularly updated folk music guide at: Folkmusic.about.com
|
|
|